Posts Tagged ‘books’
It’s amazing that I keep reading Rick Riordan books for multiple reasons. 1) They are children’s books. 2) They are all the same!
I do end up reading a lot of young adult books because they are easy reads and most of the time entertaining. I do like how Rick Riordan incorporates mythology into his story lines and I often find them informative. I read his entire Percy Jackson series and then he had The Red Pyramid (which was about Egyptian mythology. There was only one book in that series before he went back to Green/Roman mythology with The Lost Hero.
The Lost Hero is kind of a continuation of the Percy Jackson series. It’s about a new group of demi-gods that come to Camp Half-Blood, face a new prophecy that threatens the safety of the gods and the world. Jason, along with his friends Leo and Piper, have to set off to save Hera who has been kidnapped and Piper’s movie star father who has also been kidnapped. They don’t know who their enemy is but they keep being told that it is the most dangerous enemy ever. The only problem is: Jason has no memory, strange tattoos, and refers to all of the gods by their Roman names instead of their Greek names. Oh, and Percy Jackson is missing so Annabeth has to go look for him (not that that really has much to do with the storyline, but they like to randomly remind the audience of it throughout the book).
In The Lost Hero, much like the Percy Jackson books, there are three demigods that are off to save the world. Jason is the son of Zeus/Jupiter, Piper is the daughter of Aphrodite, and Leo is the son of Hephaestus. Jason is the leader of the pack, even though he doesn’t have his memory, and often surprises himself with what he is capable of. Leo can harness fire and build almost anything. And Piper can convince people to do things that they don’t want to with charmspeak.
One thing that I liked about the Percy Jackson books was that Annabeth was actually a hero in her own right. Yes, she followed Percy around, but she was often the brains of the operation and could hold her own in battle. But in The Lost Hero, Piper is often in need of being rescued and her “power” is that of talking people into things. How stereotypical is that? The girl is the one that has the power of talking men into doing things.
All throughout the book, all of the characters are saying how important Piper is to the journey. And yes, she does play an important role in the end. But it bothered me that for most of the book, she needed rescuing or she was swooning over Jason.
In the Percy Jackson books, Annabeth was her own character. But in The Lost Hero, Piper was usually only talked about in her relation to men, whether it be Jason or her movie star father.
The book was entertaining for what is was. It’s a quick read and has some good information about Greek and Roman mythology. It’s rather predictable, but I usually expect children’s books to be.
I’ve recently finished reading The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins (the first in a series, next is Catching Fire and Mockingjay comes out at the end of August). I was surprisingly impressed by the book. I had heard really good things about it, but I had no idea that it focused on a strong, self-sufficient 16-year-old girl.
The Hunger Games takes place in a the future in the continent of North America, but the country is now referred to as Panem. Panem is made up of 12 districts surrounding the Capitol (which, from the sounds of it, seems to be around the Denver area). Katniss is from the 12th district, the poorest of them all and she comes the poor part of district 12. She has to provide for both her mother and her little sister. She does this by hunting illegally in the woods around the district — she can shoot an arrow through the eye of any animal (because then it doesn’t waste any meat. Every year, the Capitol hosts the Hunger Games as a way to remind the districts of their control over them. A boy and a girl between the ages of 12 and 18 are selected from each district to participate and fight each other to the death to declare themselves the victors of the Hunger Games.
Katniss’ sister, Prim, is originally selected as the female sacrifice tribute for her district, but Katniss volunteers herself, not wanting to see her 12-year-old sister put through that. Katniss and her fellow district 12 tribute, Peeta, have to learn how to fight within the arena. It’s as much of a competition of survival as it is of fighting. But it becomes very obvious from the beginning that the Capitol and the Gamemakers like to exert their control over the tributes as a way of making sure that all the districts stay in line. Katniss is well aware of this so she is able to outsmart and out-maneuver them. You’ll have to read the book if you want to find out more about what happens specifically.
I liked this book on multiple levels. First of all, it was a science fiction/futuristic teen book that did not revolve around vampires. It had an original storyline that kept me interested. It was not just a book about these Hunger Games, but about government control and living in a society with little personal freedom.
Secondly, I loved that the main character was a teenage girl. Katniss is a girl that doesn’t trust many people because she has had to fend for herself for most of her life. Her trust doesn’t come easy. She can take care of her family by hunting, which is traditionally something that we see men doing in pop culture (just so you know, her hunting companion is male). It becomes clear right from the beginning, and even more so once the Hunger Games begin, that Katniss is smart, strong, loyal, and yet compassionate.
One thing that I did not like about the storyline was that Katniss and Peeta’s mentor thrust them into a “fake” romantic relationship in order to gain public support within the Games. I thought that it kept the storyline interesting and romantic relationships are something that a lot of teens will be interested in seeing int he books that they read. It was important for Katniss’ character development for her to be able to trust Peeta with her life as well as admit that she needed help. But I didn’t really like that Katniss needed Peeta in order to survive. Towards to the end, it became very apparent that it was actually Peeta that needed Katniss. However, their relationship just kind of felt wrong because I felt like it was bringing Katniss down from her full potential. As with most storylines, there are negatives and positives though.
I was very pleasantly surprised to see that The Hunger Games was all about a teenage girl. I have to admit that I didn’t really know a whole lot about the book before I started reading it. I didn’t even know that it centered on a teenage girl. I think that this would be a great book for teenage girls as opposed to something like Twilight, where the main girl is so emotionally as well as physically dependent on a guy.
I have recently started reading the Millennium series by Stieg Larsson. I read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo probably about a week and a half ago now and became absolutely enthralled by it. And now I’ve finished the second in the series, The Girl Who Played With Fire. I can’t wait to see how the trilogy ends in The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest. I was really impressed with the second book of this series…for a number of reasons.
Warning: minor spoilers for the first two books of the series (and please don’t leave spoilers for the third in the comments). I will not reveal any of the major revelations of the books, but I will discuss some of the aspects of the plot and character development.
When I first started The Girl Who Played With Fire I wasn’t sure how I felt about the character developments of Lisbeth Salander, the female protagonist (I don’t know if ‘protagonist’ is the right word for Salander). In The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, Salander came across as this incredibly brilliant, yet socially awkward woman, who didn’t take crap from anyone. At the beginning of Fire, we learn that Salander used a (small) portion of the money that she obtained in Dragon Tattoo to get a boob job. She spends the first 100 (or more, can’t remember) pages or so being self-conscious about not only her new breasts but her small body as well. I don’t know if this was some sort of development to make her more relate-able because, yes, everyone has body image issues. But all I saw was Salander going from this kick-ass woman to this whiny girl. I didn’t really care for it. Once we got past that part of the book, the “old” Salander seemed to come back with all her computer hacking and investigative glory. As she is described at some points throughout the book, Salander is a woman who hates men who hate women (a play on the Swedish title of Dragon Tattoo — The Men Who Hate Women).
While it did take a while a long while for the murders of this murder mystery to happen (about 200 pages or so), which we knew were going to happen based on reading the back of the book, I did find the lead up to the murders interesting (even though I was frustrated that they hadn’t happened yet — is it a bad sign when you are asking yourself when murders are finally going to happen, even if it is in a book?). The lead up to the murders dealt a lot with an expose of the sex trafficking industry in Sweden. I thought it was a very interesting approach in that it’s something that most people generally don’t want to think about (on a whole, even though it’s a really important issue). And I liked that they did focus on the victims of the sex trafficking industry, but they also looked at the financials of it and what pimps and johns gained from it.
I also thought that Fire provided an interesting look at mental illness. Salander was in and out of mental institutions in her teens and was uncooperative with authorities, so she had numerous reports of something being “wrong” with her, that she was unstable, and that she was a psychopath with violent tendencies (which, yes, she does tend to have violent tendencies, but only when provoked). During the police investigation into Salander, all they had access to were these reports, so they drew a picture of her being this crazy killer woman. It didn’t help that she didn’t have that many friends. But all of the people that they interviewed about her gave a completely different account of what she was actually like. Despite the interviews from her friends, the police were insistent for a good part that Salander was responsible for the murders because she has a history of mental illness and violence.
It was interesting to see this story line play out. As an audience, we have know that Salander had been in a mental hospital and that she was declared incompetent. But we also saw her as being able to handle herself, as a genius, albeit, socially awkward. We were just meant to believe that Salander had fallen to some bad situations that ended with her being in a mental institution (which doesn’t necessarily mean she has a mental illness — but there is talk in this book about the possibility of her having Asperger’s, but she has never been officially diagnosed). But in Fire, we see the character of Salander that we have grown accustomed to challenged by her medical reports and the police being insistent that there is something “wrong” with her. It also says a lot about the difference between reading reports of people (which are made through other people’s perceptions and biases — which plays a large role in Salander’s case) and actually getting to know the person, whether talking to them yourself or talking to the people that know her well (in the case of the book).
Overall, I thought that this was a great book. I can’t decide if I liked Fire better or Dragon Tattoo, because they have significantly different story lines despite having the same characters. In Fire, Salander and Blomkvist (the main characters) are never together except for the last page, so you don’t get too much of the interaction between them that you got in the first. And the investigations in each book are significantly different in nature — both murder investigations, but under completely different circumstances.
I will make a note at the end here though, that there are some major trigger warnings for both books. There are graphic descriptions of rape, violent scenes, domestic violence, and sex trafficking throughout both books. I thought that Dragon Tattoo was a little more graphic in its descriptions, but there are still some major trigger warnings for Fire.
That being said, I would highly recommend this trilogy to anyone, just be aware of these trigger warnings as I was not when I first started reading Dragon Tattoo.
I’ve been working on my Christmas shopping and I recently got a bunch of books for my cousin’s kids. I was really excited when I found one of my favorite books from my childhood for my cousin’s daughter — The Paper Bag Princess by Robert Munsch. I think it is books like these that started to lay my foundation in feminism.
The Paper Bag Princess is a children’s book about a prince and a princess who are set to get married. A dragon attacks the castle and kidnaps the prince — and all of the princess’ clothes were burned. So the princess put on a paper bag and followed the dragon to get her prince back. She outsmarted the dragon and was able to get her prince back. But when the prince saw her, he criticized her appearance. So she left him.
I really liked (and still like) this book because it is the woman who tracks down the dragon and tricks him into getting her prince back. But at the end, she doesn’t just accept how he treats her — she doesn’t stand for it.
It’s a children’s book with a strong female character who can fend for herself and doesn’t take crap from anyone. If only more children’s books (and books in general) were like this.
I work in a bookstore. We’ve been selling a lot of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series, and with the first one being made into a movie (which looked pretty entertaining), so I decided to pick up the first book and see how it went. I bought The Lightning Theif on Sunday and 50 hours later, I had finished it. That’s with having to work and work on grad school applications (being a slow reader with a short attention span, that’s a pretty small time frame for me). Granted, the book is written for around a 7th grade reading level, but it is a really easy and fast read.
So here’s the basic story: Percy Jackson is a 12-year-old boy, with dislexia and ADHD, who is constantly getting kicked out of private schools. But then he is attached by a monster and learns that he is a half-blood, or demigod. His father is the Sea God, Posiedon. Percy is taken to Camp Half-Blood, the only safe place on Earth for half-bloods. But everything is now fine and dandy there. We learn that the Olympian gods are alive and well living in America on the 600th floor of the Empire State Building. But Zeus’ master lightning bolt has been stolen and he suspects Percy. Percy has to find the stolen master bolt in 10 days in order to prevent a war among the “Big Three” — Zeus, Posiedon, and Hades. Percy goes on a cross-country journey with two of his friends looking for the bolt and discovering things about his family and the Greek Gods along the way.
As you read the book, you can see a very clear paralell to Harry Potter. A young boy learns the true identity and powers of his family, moves to a place where he is among people of his own kind and instantly feels at home, then has to go save the world. But the similarity in the storylines didn’t bother me that much. I really like the Harry Potter books and there is a good amount of difference to keep it interesting.
But there is one thing that definitely stands out about the Percy Jackson books — they are very clearly marketed to middle school aged boys. Ok, that makes sense. The hero (quite literaly since he is the son of a god) is a middle school aged boy. There was one review that I read, though, that made it sound like it would be surprising that girls would like the book. But obviously, that’s not true, since I liked it, and some of the other women that I talked to at work about it liked it.
But it’s not just that the book is marketed to boys, the entire book is very boy-centric. The only girl in the book that is discussed at any length is Annabeth, the daughter of Athena, who is one of Percy’s friends that goes on his quest with him. Percy’s mother also plays a major role throughout the book, but not as a character, just as a thought. And then there was the story of Thalia, the daughter of Zeus, who was turned into a pine tree after her death. It’s fair to say, the book is pretty much all about boys. Even among the gods, Athena is the only female god that is discussed in any depth and that’s only because she was Annabeth’s mother. Even though there are few girls or women portrayed in any depth in the book, Annabeth is pretty awesome. She’s the daughter of Athena and always has a plan worthy of her mother (as they say). Even though Percy did all of the big stuff in the book, he wouldn’t have made it without Annabeth.
I did really like that there was Greek mythology intertwined with the entire story. I used to be very into Greek mythology when I was younger, so it was really nice to see some of that information in a mainstream book like this. And it is a great adventure book — which apparently girls can’t enjoy.
As for the movie…it looks pretty good, but it also looks like they might have changed some of the storyline (but it is really hard to tell that from a trailer). It’s also no surprise that the movie is directed by the same person that directed the first two Harry Potter movies. And Percy looks to be a little older than 12 in the movie. Which I think is ok because I don’t think it’s entirely believable to have two 12-year-olds and a satyr go on a cross-country journey from Long Island to LA and back. I mean, it is in the book, but it’s an entirely different thing when you see it. Anyways, I’ve included the trailer at the bottom so you all can take a look.
Have any of you read the book? What did you think? Please keep it a discussion to the first book, The Lightning Thief, as I am reading the second one, The Sea of Monsters, right now.